A Comparative Study On the Academic Performance of Day Scholar and Hostel Medical Undergraduate Students

Life Sciences -Anatomy

Authors

  • G. Priyanka Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, Sree Balaji Medical College & Hospital, Thandalam, Chennai
  • M. Kumaresan Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Saveetha Medical College & Hospital, Thandalam, Chennai
  • Sangeetha Achuthan Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Saveetha Medical College & Hospital, Thandalam, Chennai https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5916-5318
  • Chaturitha. K II MBBS, Department of Anatomy, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai
  • Gunapriya Raghunath Professor & HOD, Department of Anatomy, Saveetha Medical College & Hospital, Thandalam, Chennai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22376/ijlpr.2023.13.5.L392-L398

Keywords:

Student performance, day scholar, hostelers, theory exam, practical exam

Abstract

Examinations are the greater source of anxiety in medical education, and they can be greatly affected by the residential status of medical students. The study compares the academic performance between the day scholar students and the hostelers pursuing the first year of MBBS. This study was conducted at Saveetha Medical College, Chennai, India. Assessment of the marks obtained by both groups of students was done. Two exams, one theory and one practical exam, including viva voce, were taken for analysis. All 149 students attended both exams. Students in both categories were divided into 4 groups according to the marks obtained. Students who obtained < 50% marks were categorized as Group A, 50 to 69 % as Group B, 70% to 89% as Group C, and> 90% as Group D. In this study, 149 students participated. Among these, 82 students (55.03%) were day scholars, and 67 (44.96%) were hostelers. In the theory exam, 59.8% of day scholars belonged to Group B compared to 55.2% of hostelers. Only 6.09% of day scholar students were in group A as opposed to 19.4% of Hostelers in the same group. In Practical exams, amongst day scholars, 52.4% were in group B compared to 46.2% of hostelers in the same group. Only 4.9% of day scholars were in Group A as opposed to 19.4% of hostelers in the same group. There was a significant difference academically between the two groups of students involved in this study. The day scholars performed better than Hostelers in academics.

References

Bahadar N, MahnazW, Jadoon S, Jadoon S. A comparative analysis of the behaviors and performance of day scholar and boarder students at secondary school level. Am J Educ Res. 2014;2(8):600-2. doi: 10.12691/education-2-8-7.

Jagero NO, Agak J, Ayodo TM. 2010. An Evaluation of Home Environmental Factors Affecting performance of Boarding Secondary School Students in Kenya. Analytical reports.inted. union council; 3: 47-62.

Adams DW.Education for extinction.Topeka:University of Nebraska Press;1995. p. 57-8.

Egbewale BE, Adeeyo OA, Ogunro PS, Olowu AO, Adeoti ML, Adewole TA. Predictors of students’performance in the pre-clinical MBBS programme in a Nigerian University. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2009;16(4):245-50. doi: 10.4103/1117-1936.181407, PMID 20527376.

Faisal R, Shinwari L, Izzat S. Academic performance of day scholars versus boarders in pharmacology examinations of a medical school in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66(9):1094-7. PMID 27654727.

HolsingerDB, JacobJW, MigumuBC. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of secondary Schools in Uganda: comparison of Government and private schools. Brigham: Kennedy Centre for International Studies of Brigham Young University; 2002.

KitaviM, WesthuizanP. Problems facingbeginningschoolprincipals in Kenya. Paper Presented in CIG Meeting in New York; 1997.

OlufemiOT, AdediranAA, Ovediran WO. Factors affecting students’ academic performance in colleges of education in South west Nigeria.BrJ Educ. 2018;6(10):43-56.

Adeyele.J.S & Yusuf.Y.S. Effect of teaching method, choice of discipline and student -lecturer relationship on academic performance. J Econ SustainDev. 2012;3(7):1-7.

Ali S, Haider Z, Munir F, Khan H, Ahmed A. Factors contributing to the student academic performance: A case study of Islamia university sub campus. Am J Educ Res. 2013;1(8):283-9. doi: 10.12691/education-1-8-3.

Valli Jayanthi SV, Balakrishnan S, Lim Siok Ching A, Aaqilah Abdul Latiff N, Nasirudeen AMA. Factors contributing to academicperformance of students in a Tertiary Institution in Singapore. AmJ EducRes.2014;2(9):752-8. doi: 10.12691/education-2-9-8.

Rahimpour.M & Magsoudpour.M.2011. Teachers students interactions in task based Vs form- focussed instruction. World journal of education;1(1):171-8.

Rogaten J, Moneta GB, Spada MM. Academic Performance as a Function of Approaches to Studying and Affect in Studying. J Happiness Stud.2013;14(6):1751-63. doi: 10.1007/s10902-012-9408-5.

Pilcher JJ, Walters AS. How sleep deprivation affects psychological variables related to college students’ cognitive performance. J AmCollHealth. 1997;46(3):121-6. doi: 10.1080/07448489709595597, PMID 9394089.

Kelly.W, Kelly. K and Clanton.R. CollStudJ.2001. The relationship between sleep length and grade point average among college students;35:84-7.

Nonis SA.S and Hudson.G. Academic performance of colleges students: Influence of time spent studying and working. J Educ Bus. 2006;81(3):151-9.

Kleijn.W.c.VanderPloeg.H.M and Tpman.R.M. PsycholRep. 1994. Cognition, study habits, test anxiety and academic performance;75:1219-26.

Yousuf.M. Sarwar. M, Ranijha.A. Asian SocSci.2011. A study of non-cognitive variables of academic achievement at higher education: Nominal group study;7(7):53-8.

Farooq, ChaudhryAH. Shafiq. M, Berhanu.G.2011. Fators affecting students’ quality of academic performance: A case of secondary school level. Journal of quality and technology management;7(2):1-14.

Fantuzzo J, Tighe E, Childs S. Family Involvement Questionnaire: a multivariate assessment of family participation in early childhood education. J EducPsychol. 2000;92(2):367-76. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.367.

Trusty.J (199). Effects of eighth-grade parental involvement on late adolescents’ educational expectations. J Res Dev Educ;32(4):224-33.

Barnard WM. Parent involvement in elementary school and educational attainment. Child Youth ServRev. 2004;26(1):39-62. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2003.11.002.

Shumox.L and Lomax.R. Parenting.2001. Parental efficacy: Predictor of parenting behaviour and adolescent outcomes;2(2):127-50.

Khurshid F, Tanveer A, Qasmi FN. Relationship between study habits and academic achievement among hostel living and day scholars’ university students. BrJ Humanit SocSci. 2012;3:34-42.

Khan MS,Malik AR,AshrafButt AU, Khalid A, Maqbool S, Khan H,etal.PersonalityDynamismandAcademicPerformance among BoardersandNon-boarders StudyinginaMedicalUniversity.Cureus. 2019;11(7):e5072. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5072, PMID 31516783.

Roy SS, Chadalawada J. Predictors of academic performance of medical undergraduate students of microbiology class in Kolkata. Int J Med Public Health. 2014;4(4):392-95. doi: 10.4103/2230-8598.144077.

Republic of Kenya. Government Printer;2005. Sessional Paper Number One of 2005: A Policy Framework for Educational Training and Research, Nairobi.

Walker SP, Grantham-McGregor SM, Himes JH, Williams S, Duff EM. School performance in adolescent Jamaican girls: associations with health, social and behavioural characteristics, and risk factors for dropout. J Adolesc.1998;21(1):109-22. doi: 10.1006/jado.1997.0133, PMID 9503079.

T A, H S, Vangaveti S. Assessing altered sleep patterns among medical students. J Pharm Sci Innov.2015;4(1):59-64. doi: 10.7897/2277-4572.04114.

AroraN, SinghN. Factors affecting the academic performance of college students, I-Manager’s.J EducTechnol. 2017;14(1):1-8.

Published

2023-09-01

How to Cite

Priyanka, G. ., Kumaresan, M., Achuthan, S. ., K, C., & Raghunath, G. . (2023). A Comparative Study On the Academic Performance of Day Scholar and Hostel Medical Undergraduate Students: Life Sciences -Anatomy. International Journal of Life Science and Pharma Research, 13(5), L392-L398. https://doi.org/10.22376/ijlpr.2023.13.5.L392-L398

Issue

Section

Research Articles