A Comparison Between Visual, Digital Photography, And Polarizing Filter Photography for Shade Selection Among the Adult Jeddah Population
Life Sciences-Dentistry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22376/ijlpr.2023.13.5.L199-L208Keywords:
Digital method, Dental technician, Dental practitioners, Esthetic dentistry, polarizing filter method, Shade selection, and Visual method.Abstract
Shade selection plays an important role in esthetic dentistry. Modern dentistry has various methods of shade selection, such as visual, digital, and polarized filter methods. Hence, our aim of this study was to determine which of the three named methods was more accurate for shade selection in aesthetic dentistry, and study objectives of the study were to assess the shade of a maxillary central incisor by visual, digital and polarized filter method and to find out which is more suited for shade selection. This clinical observational (analytical, cross-sectional, and descriptive) study was conducted at Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Jeddah. A total of 80 participants were selected randomly. For each all the participants, shade selection was performed by visual, digital, and polarized filter methods. SPSS version 21 was used to perform the statistical analysis. A Chi-square test was applied for qualitative variables to find the association. The level of significance is set at 0.05. Among the participants, 52 (65.0%) participants were female, (35.0%) participants were male, and the minimum age of them was 20, whereas the maximum ages were 50. Among the population pool of the study, 52 (65%) and 28 (35%) participants were female and male, respectively. The minimum age of the participants was 20, and the maximum was 50 years. The study results showed that a polarized filter shade selection method was the most accurate among the three methods of shade selection. It is recommended to select a shade for the esthetic procedures by combining visual, digital, and polarizing filter methods to get accurate shade. It should be added as a part of the curriculum, and emphasis should be given to the various techniques of shade selection.
References
ShettyKarunakaret al. Awareness among undergraduate dental students regarding computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing technology in various universities at Makkah region, Saudi Arabia- A questionnaire-based study. Int. Life Sci PharmRes.2022.12.5:L103-109.
Kelkar KC, Dogra ES, Bhat V, Prasad DK, Hegde C. A comparison between visual, digital photography, and polarizing filter photography for shade selection. Indian J Dent Res.2020;31(5):712-7. doi:10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_286_19, PMID 33433508.
CoachmanC, BohnerL, JreigeCS, SesmaN, CalamitaM. Interdisciplinary guided dentistry, digital quality control, and the ’copy-paste’ concepts. J Esthet Restor Dent.2021;33(7):982-91. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12736, PMID 33899323.
RokayaD, KitisubkanchanaJ, WonglamsamA, SantiwongP, SrithavajT, HumagainM. Nepalese esthetic dental (NED)proportion in Nepalese population. Kathmandu UnivMedJ (KUMJ).2015;13(51):244-9. doi: 10.3126/kumj.v13i3.16816, PMID 27180372.
HumagainM, RokayaD, SriiR, DixitS, KafleD. Gender based comparison of gingival zenith esthetics. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ).2016;14(54):148-52. PMID 28166072.
FerroukhiR, El-MahallawiOS, HussienAN. Impact of digital photography and conventional method on the accuracy of shade matching in the esthetic zone: in vivo study. Acta SciDentSci. 2020;4:82-94.
NahsanFPS, MondelliRFL, FrancoEB, NaufelFS, UedaJK, SchmittVLet al.Clinical strategies for esthetic excellence in anterior tooth restorations: understanding color and composite resin selection. JAppl Oral Sci.2012;20(2):151-6. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000200005, PMID 22666829.
DietschiD. Optimizing aesthetics and facilitating the clinical application of freehand bonding using the ’natural layering concept’. BrDentJ.2008;204(4):181-5. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2008.100, PMID 18297019.
FrancaF, FrancischaneC, Medina-ValdiviaJ, BaseggiaW.Reproducing the natural aspects of dental tissues with resin composites in proximal incisal restorations. Quintessence Int.2007;38:505-10.
MoussaouiH, MdaghriE, Gouma M, Bennani A. B: accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital intraoral scanner for shade selection: current status of the literature. Oral Health DentSci.2018;2:1-6.
ChuSJ, TrushkowskyRD, Paravina RD.Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. JDent.2010;38;Suppl 2:e2-e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.001, PMID 20621154.
Siddique SN, KhanFR, BabarP. Comparison of tooth shade matching using visual and digital camera methods. Pak Oral DentJ.2019;39:184-8.
LiberatoWF, BarretoIC, CostaPP, de AlmeidaCC, PimentelW, TiossiR. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study. JProsthetDent.2019;121(2):271-5. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.004, PMID 30722987.
ReyesJ, AcostaP, VenturaD. Repeatability of the human eye compared to an intraoral scanner in dental shade matching.Heliyon.2019;5(7):e02100. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02100, PMID 31372552.
BrandtJ, NelsonS, Lauer HC, Von HehnU, BrandtS. In vivo study for tooth color determination—visual versus digital. Clin Oral Investig.2017;21(9):2863-71. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2088-0, PMID 28265772.
GotfredsenK, GramM, Ben BrahemE, HosseiniM, PetkovM, SitorovicM. Effectiveness of shade measurements using a scanning and computer software system: A pilot study. IntJ Oral Dent Health.2015;1:2.
AmornvitP, RokayaD, PeampringC, SanohkanS. Confocal 3D opticalintraoralscanners and comparison of image capturing accuracy. ComputMaterContin.2021;66:303-14.
Sampaio CS, Gurrea J, Gurrea M, Bruguera A, Atria PJ, Janal M, et al. Dental shade guide variability for hues B, C, and D using cross-polarized photography. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent.2018;38; Suppl:s113–s118. doi: 10.11607/prd.3270, PMID 29677224.
Schropp L. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software. J Prosthodont.2009;18(3):235-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00409.x, PMID 19141046.
Miyajiwala JS, Kheur MG, Patankar AH, Lakha TA. Comparison of photographic and conventional methods for tooth shade selection: A clinical evaluation. J Indian Prosthodont Soc.2017;17(3):273-81. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_342_16, PMID 28936042.
Tam WK, Lee HJ. Accurate shade image matching by using a smartphone camera. J Prosthodont Res.2017;61(2):168-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.004, PMID 27553123.
Jarad FD, Russell MD, Moss BW. The use of digital imaging for color matching and communication in restorative dentistry. Br Dent J.2005;199(1):43-9; discussion 33. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4812559, PMID 16003426.
Clary JA, Ontiveros JC, Cron SG, Paravina RD. Influence of light source, polarization, education, and training on shade matching quality. J Prosthet Dent.2016;116(1):91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.008, PMID 26851189.
Gurrea J, Gurrea M, Bruguera A, Sampaio CS, Janal M, Bonfante E, et al. Evaluation of dental shade guide variability using cross-polarized photography. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent.2016;36(5):e76-81. doi: 10.11607/prd.2700, PMID 27560681.
Baharin SAet al. Anterior tooth shade selection procedure influence of light sources and patients position; SainsMalaysia.2013;42(1):7-11.
Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research?Indian J PsycholMed.2013;35(2):121-26. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.116232, PMID 24049221.
SirintawatN, Leelaratrungruang T, Poovarodom P, Kiattavorncharoen S, Amornsettachai P. The accuracy and reliability of tooth shade selection using different instrumental techniques: an in vitro study.Sensors (Basel).2021;21(22):7490. 40. doi: 10.3390/s21227490, PMID 34833565.
Fairchild MD, Reniff L. Time course of chromatic adaptation for color-appearance judgments.J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis.1995;12(5):824-33. doi: 10.1364/josaa.12.000824, PMID 7730950.
McLaren EA, Figueira J, Goldstein RE.A technique using calibrated photography and Photoshop for accurate shade analysis and communication.Compend ContinEduc Dent.2017;38(2):106-13. PMID 28156124.
ShettyKarunakaret al.Visual Enhancement and Experiences with Magnification Devices among the undergraduate dental students and Interns Around Makkah Region- A Questionnaire-based Study: ijlpr. 2020.10.5; 79-90.
Gasparik Cet al.Influence of light source and clinical experience on shade matching; Clujul Medical 87.1: 2014: 30. 32. Juzer S. Miyajiwala: comparison of photographic and conventional methods for tooth shade selection: A clinical evaluation. J Indian ProsthodontSoc.2017;17(3):273-81.
Lakhanpal S, Neelima MS. Accuracy of three shade-matching devices in replicating the shade of metal-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract.2016;17(12):1003-8. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1971, PMID 27965487.
Li Q, Yu H, Wang YN. In vivo spectrophotometric evaluation of color matching errors among five shade guides. J Oral Rehabil.2009;36(1):65-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01894.x, PMID 18976272.
Zenthöfer A, Wiesberg S, Hildenbrandt A, Reinelt G, Rammelsberg P, Hassel AJ.Selecting Vita classical shade with the Vita 3D master shade guide. IntJ Prosthodont. 2014;27(4):376-82. doi: 10.11607/ijp.3770, PMID 25010883.
Pitel ML. Optimizing your shade matching success tips, tools, and clinical techniques.DentToday. 2015;34(9); 9:116-8. PMID 26480633.
Fondriest J. Shade matching in restorative dentistry: the science and strategies. IntJ Periodontics RestorativeDent. 2003;23(5): 5:467-79. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.03.015, PMID 14620121.
Jaju RA, Nagai S, Karimbux N, Da Silva JD.Evaluating tooth color matching ability of dental students. J DentEduc.2010;74(9):1002-10. doi: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2010.74.9.tb04956.x, PMID 20837742.
Ristic I, Stankovic S, Paravina RD.Influence of color education and training on shade matching skills. J Esthet Restor Dent.2016;28(5):287-94. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12209, PMID 27061853.
Joshi R, Acharya J.Shade matching ability of dental students using two visual light sources.Nepal MedCollJ.2017;19:24-6.
HardanL. Protocols for mobile dental photography with auxiliary lighting. JCraniomandib Sleep Pract.2021;39:181.
AlghazaliN, BurnsideG, MoallemM, SmithP, PrestonA, JaradFD. Assessment of perceptibility and acceptability of color difference of denture teeth. JDent.2012;40;Suppl 1:e10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.023, PMID 22561647.
BergmanB, NilsonH, AnderssonM. A longitudinal clinical study of proceraceramic-veneeredtitaniumcopings. IntJProsthodont.1999;12(2):135-9. PMID 10371915.
PaoloneG, OrsiniG, ManautaJ, DevotoW, PutignanoA. Composite shade guides and color matching. IntJ Esthet Dent.2014;9(2):164-82. PMID 24765625.
JorqueraGJ, AtriaPJ, GalánM, FeureisenJ, ImbarakM, KernitskyJet al.A comparison of ceramic crown color difference between different shade selection methods: visual, digital camera, and smartphone. JProsthetDent.2022;128(4):784-92. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.029, PMID 33741142.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Dr Karunakar Shetty, Farah Khalid Alesayi, Aroub Mohsen. Albakri, Rahaf Qasem. Balah, Ashwag Hussain. Alzahib, Afrah Mohammed Alunazi, Saad Ali A Alghamdi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.