Comparative Quality Evaluation of Different Brands of Albendazole Tablets Marketed in India

Pharmaceutical Science-Pharmacy

Authors

  • Mukesh Kumar Kumawat School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Apeejay Stya University, Sohna-Palwal Road, Sohna, Gurugram, Haryana-122001
  • Gufran Ajmal School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Apeejay Stya University, Sohna-Palwal Road, Sohna, Gurugram, Haryana-122001
  • Heena Jindal School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Apeejay Stya University, Sohna-Palwal Road, Sohna, Gurugram, Haryana-122001

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22376/ijlpr.2023.13.SP1.P1-7

Keywords:

Albendazole Tablet, Indian Pharmacopoeia, WHO-GMP, Physicochemical Equivalence, In-Vitro Evaluation

Abstract

Anthelmintic drugs are primarily used to treat parasitic infections. More than 1.5 billion individuals, or 24% of the world's population, were estimated to be infected by soil-transmitted helminths. Pharmaceuticals are essential for preserving human health and fostering happiness. However, it is vital to determine the drug's safety, efficacy, and quality to provide the intended pharmacological effect. The drugs must have the necessary physical properties and the correct quantity of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) to be effective. The quality of various brands of albendazole tablets sold in India was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively in this study. The current study aims to investigate the physicochemical comparability of three different brands of albendazole containing tablets obtained from several retail pharmacies in Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India. The Indian Pharmacopeia standards were used as a control to evaluate the identity and content of the API in the tablets. The tablet’s uniformity of weight, friability, hardness, thickness, rate of dissolution, and content analysis were assessed using an assay. Ultraviolet-Visible Spectroscopy (UVS) was used to identify and evaluate Indian Pharmacopoeial standards. All in vitro evaluation tests showed that all three tablet brands complied with the Indian Pharmacopoeial standards. The quantity of albendazole released from the various brands did not differ noticeably. These findings showed that the tablets of albendazole sold in retail stores in Agra are produced and marketed by Indian firms that have received WHO-GMP certification. On the bioequivalence of these tablets, more research is suggested. Keywords: Albendazole Tablet, Indian Pharmacopoeia, WHO-GMP, Physicochemical Equivalence, In-Vitro Evaluation

References

Yadav P, Singh R. A review on anthelmintic drugs and their future scope. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2011;3:17-21.

Available from: http://www.who.int assessed on 12.04.2013.

Horton J. Albendazole: a review of anthelmintic efficacy and safety in humans. Parasitology. 2000;121;Suppl:S113-32. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000007290, PMID 11386684.

Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov assessed on 10.06.2013.

Khokra SL et al. Formulation development and evaluation of chewable tablet of albendazole by different techniques. Int J Pharm Sci. 2012;4(1):461-4.

Ghotkar MN, Jamdar RM, Mahajan RR, Chougule AS, Dhavane SM, Ingole PN et al. In-vitro Evaluation of different marketed brands of Rabiprazol Tablets using Quality Control Tests. Asian Jour Pharmac Anal. 2020;10(2):99-102. doi: 10.5958/2231-5675.2020.00017.4.

Chai JY, Hong ST. Chemotherapy of intestinal nematode infections. J Korean Soc Chemother. 1985;3:119-29.

Seifu A, Kebede E, Bacha B, Melaku A, Setegn T. Quality of albendazole tablets legally circulating in the pharmaceutical market of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: physicochemical evaluation. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40360-019-0299-5, PMID 31023365.

Chai JY, Jung BK, Hong SJ. Albendazole and mebendazole as anti-parasitic and anti-cancer agents: an update. Korean J Parasitol. 2021;59(3):189-225. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2021.59.3.189, PMID 34218593.

Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov assessed on 09.06.2013.

Hambisa S, Belew S, Suleman S. In vitro comparative quality assessment of different brands of norfloxacin tablets available in Jimma, southwest Ethiopia. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2019;13:1241-9. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S189524, PMID 31118565.

Abebe S, Ketema G, Kassahun H. In vitro comparative quality assessment of different brands of furosemide tablets marketed in Northwest Ethiopia. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2020;14:5119-28. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S280203, PMID 33262573.

Seitzer M, Klapper S, Mazigo HD, Holzgrabe U, Mueller A. Quality and composition of albendazole, mebendazole and praziquantel available in Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana and Tanzania. PLOS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(1):e0009038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009038. PMID 33493211.

Sitre DG, Kamble RK. Formulation development and evaluation of new albendazole tablets with integrated quality by design (QbD) approach. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2021;11(2):123-34. doi: 10.22270/jddt.v11i2.4782.

Herbert L, Lachman L, Schwartz BJ. Chewable tablet pharmaceutical dosage forms: tablets. 2nd ed; 1989.

The Indian pharmacopoeia. Vol. I; 2010. p. 187-93.

The Indian pharmacopoeia. Vol. II; 2010. p. 780-1.

Othman GQ. Quality assessment of seven brands of albendazole tablets marketed in Yemen. Yemeni J Med Sci. 2017;11(1):46-52. doi: 10.20428/YJMS.11.1.A7.

Gebrezgabiher A, Yilma Z, Tadese E. Comparative in vitro quality evaluation of different brands of mebendazole tablets, marketed in Mekelle town, Tigray, Ethiopia. J Pharm Sci Technol. 2015;5(2):98-101.

Published

2022-12-23

How to Cite

Kumar Kumawat, M., Ajmal, G., & Jindal, H. (2022). Comparative Quality Evaluation of Different Brands of Albendazole Tablets Marketed in India: Pharmaceutical Science-Pharmacy. International Journal of Life Science and Pharma Research, 13(SP 1), P1–7. https://doi.org/10.22376/ijlpr.2023.13.SP1.P1-7

Issue

Section

Research Articles