Comparison of Change in Periodontal Risk in Adult Patients Following Phase I Therapy – A Preliminary Study

Life Sciences-Periodontics&Dentistry

Authors

  • Shreya Shetty BDS, MDS(Periodontics), FICOI https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0992-0084
  • Ola Hashim Fatani Dental intern, Dentistry Program
  • Raghad Abdulhadi Aljabri Dental intern, Dentistry Program
  • Nojoud Mohammed Alameel Dental intern, Dentistry Program
  • Nour Abdulmajeed Lardhi Dental intern, Dentistry Program
  • MS Khammarunissa Shaikh Quality assurance center, Ibnsina National College of Medical Sciences, Jeddah, Ksa.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22376/ijpbs/lpr.2022.12.6.L124-131

Keywords:

Periodontal risk, PRA tool, phase 1 therapy, and phase 1 re-evaluation.

Abstract

Periodontal risk assessment is essential to ensure the successful outcome of periodontal therapy. Various assessment tools have been devised over the years of which the periodontal risk assessment(PRA) tool by Lang & Tonetti is one of the more authentic tools, and it assesses the risk of severity of periodontal disease by taking into account various components which are a combination of risk factors, indicators, and markers. The present study used this tool to evaluate the change in periodontal risk following phase 1 periodontal therapy. Following the approval from the institutional ethical committee, 299 male and female patients aged 18 to 60 years undergoing comprehensive clinical care (CCC) at ISNC dental clinics from October 2020 until April 2021 were selected, and PRA was assessed at baseline (before phase 1 therapy) and following a re-evaluation of phase 1 therapy (4-6 weeks after phase 1 therapy). All the parameters of the Lang and Tonetti’s PRA model were recorded, and the periodontal risk was calculated accordingly. The data collected was entered into a Microsoft excel sheet. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSSV 22 software. The results showed significant differences in essential risk parameters – sites with bleeding on probing(BOP), alveolar bone loss, and polygon surface area for risk. (P<0.05). These were the expected parameters to change following phase -1 therapy, thus having a profound influence on the periodontal risk. However, chi-square values showed no changes in systemic and general factors and smoking. (P>0.05) These factors are usually permanent and often impossible to eliminate, even if under control. Concerning smoking, even if the patients quit or reduce the number of cigarettes smoked, the alteration in risk levels is minimal or negligible. Thus, Phase 1 periodontal therapy significantly influences the risk levels in adult patients. 

References

Chandra RV. Evaluation of a novel periodontal risk assessment model in patients presenting for dental care. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2007;5(1):39-48. PMID 17366760.

Dhulipalla R, Bade S, Bollepalli AC, Katuri KK, Devulapalli NS, Swarna C SC. Evaluation of periodontal risk in adult patients using two different risk assessment models – A pilot study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(2):ZC25–9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11772.5556, PMID 25859520.

Jansson H, Norderyd O. Evaluation of a periodontal risk assessment model in subjects with severe periodontitis. A 5-year retrospective study. Swed Dent J. 2008;32(1):1-7. PMID 18540515.

Lang NP, Tonetti MS. Periodontal risk assessment (PRA) for patients in supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). Oral Health Prev Dent. 2003;1(1):7-16. PMID 15643744.

Page RC, Martin JA, Loeb CF. The Oral Health information suite (OHIS): its Use in the management of periodontal disease. J Dent Educ. 2005;69(5):509-20. doi: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2005.69.5.tb03939.x, PMID 15897333.

Persson GR, Mancl LA, Martin J, Page RC. Assessing periodontal disease risk: a comparison of clinicians’ assessment versus a computerized tool. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(5):575-82. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0224, PMID 12785492.

Wayne K, Robert D, John M, Steven E. Current status of periodontal risk assessment. J Evid Base Dent Pract. 2012;1:2-11.

KOSMATH W. Der Verlust an Schwefelwasserstoff beim üblichen Trinkverfahren. Zeitschrift für Phys Ther Bäder- und. 1949;2(9-10):138-40.

Raul I, Garcia ME. Nunn and Thomas Dietrich. Risk calculation and periodontal outcomes. Periodontol 2000. 2009;62:65-77.

Page RC, Beck JD. Risk assessment for periodontal diseases. Int Dent J. 1997;47(2):61-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.1997.tb00680.x, PMID 9448791.

Van der Weijden GAF, Dekkers GJ, Slot DE (F). Success of nonsurgical periodontal therapy in adult periodontitis patients: A retrospective analysis. Int J Dent Hyg. 2019;17(4):309-17. doi: 10.1111/idh.12399, PMID 30942938.

Cobb CM. Clinical significance of nonsurgical periodontal therapy: an evidence‐based perspective of scaling and rootplaning. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;2:6-16.

Becker W, Becker BE, Berg LE. Periodontal treatment without maintenance. A retrospective study in 44 patients. J Periodontol. 1984;55(9):505-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.1984.55.9.505, PMID 6592322.

Axelsson P, Lindhe J. Effect of controlled oral hygiene procedures on caries and periodontal disease in adults. Results after 6 years. J Clin Periodontol. 1981a;8(3):239-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1981.tb02035.x, PMID 6947990.

Becker W, Becker BE, Berg LE. Periodontal treatment without maintenance. A retrospective study in 44 patients. J Periodontol. 1984;55(9):505-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.1984.55.9.505, PMID 6592322.

Cobb CM. Clinical significance of nonsurgical periodontal therapy: an evidence‐based perspective of scaling and rootplaning. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;2:6-16.

Kim TS, Schenk A, Lungeanu D, Reitmeir P, Eickholz P. Nonsurgical and surgical periodontal therapy in single‐rooted teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11(4):391-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-007-0144-x, PMID 17690922.

Badersten A, Nilveus R, Egelberg J. Effect of nonsurgical periodon‐ tal therapy. II. Severely advanced periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 1984;11(1):63-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1984.tb01309.x, PMID 6363463.

Baelum V, Lopéz R. Defining and predicting outcomes of non‐sur‐ gical periodontal treatment: a 1‐yr follow‐up study. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124(1):33-44. doi: 10.1111/eos.12240, PMID 26714428.

Sanz M, Bäumer A, Buduneli N, et al. Effect of professional me‐ chanical plaque removal on secondary prevention of prevention of periodontitis and the complications of gingival and periodontal pre‐ ventive measures: consensus report of group 4 ofthe. J Clin Periodontol 11th Eur Workshop on Periodontology on effective prevention of periodontal and peri‐implant diseases. 2015;42:214-20.

Published

2022-10-12

How to Cite

Shetty, S., Fatani, O. H., Aljabri, R. A., Alameel, N. M., Lardhi, N. A., & Shaikh, M. K. (2022). Comparison of Change in Periodontal Risk in Adult Patients Following Phase I Therapy – A Preliminary Study: Life Sciences-Periodontics&Dentistry. International Journal of Life Science and Pharma Research, 12(6), L124-L131. https://doi.org/10.22376/ijpbs/lpr.2022.12.6.L124-131

Issue

Section

Research Articles